Jump to content


Photo

OE 2.0 - DreamBox


  • Please log in to reply
72 replies to this topic

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #41 MiLo

  • PLi® Core member
  • 14,042 posts

+298
Excellent

Posted 7 May 2012 - 09:31

As for DMM's "OE2.0", that's just a slightly different way of building the same thing. The new drivers and kernels for the dreamboxes can also be compiled from the OpenPLi 2.1 system, delivering the same end result.
Real musicians never die - they just decompose

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #42 pieterg

  • PLi® Core member
  • 32,766 posts

+245
Excellent

Posted 7 May 2012 - 09:50

And also, "OE-2.0" is not closed. It's enigma2 which is closed.

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #43 a4tech

  • Senior Member
  • 39 posts

-2
Neutral

Posted 7 May 2012 - 13:55

Do You plan to add (clone oe.20 repo of webkit ) a Web Browser to OpenPLi tree, for Dreambox boxes ? and HBBTV ?

Edited by a4tech, 7 May 2012 - 13:55.


Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #44 pieterg

  • PLi® Core member
  • 32,766 posts

+245
Excellent

Posted 7 May 2012 - 13:58

no, we will keep using our own enigma2.

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #45 Happysat

  • Senior Member
  • 697 posts

+43
Good

Posted 7 May 2012 - 16:53

And using kernel 3.2 with the new drivers also gonna happen in the future for PLi pieterg..??

Edited by Happysat, 7 May 2012 - 16:54.

Octagon SF8008 / TBS5530  DVB-S2/T2 T-85/1.50Mtr/3x90cm (53e 52e 51,5e 28e 25,9e 23e 19e 13e 9e 4e 1w 5w 14w)


Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #46 pieterg

  • PLi® Core member
  • 32,766 posts

+245
Excellent

Posted 7 May 2012 - 17:03

yes, assuming that our e2 will still work with the new drivers

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #47 Happysat

  • Senior Member
  • 697 posts

+43
Good

Posted 7 May 2012 - 22:19

Okay thanks i did see allready 3.2 references in OpenPLi GIT :)

Octagon SF8008 / TBS5530  DVB-S2/T2 T-85/1.50Mtr/3x90cm (53e 52e 51,5e 28e 25,9e 23e 19e 13e 9e 4e 1w 5w 14w)


Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #48 malakudi

  • Senior Member
  • 1,449 posts

+69
Good

Posted 8 May 2012 - 09:32


What all this fuss is about? DMM just switched to newer kernel and adopted interesting features that were already available in their competitors' products. They didn't copy OpenPLI and OpenPLI didn't steal anything from DMM.

How do you know their closed-source C++ code does not contain something 'borrowed' from our open source C++ code?


I don't. I was actually taking about 3.2 kernel usage, not the closed source enigma2 code.

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #49 Happysat

  • Senior Member
  • 697 posts

+43
Good

Posted 8 May 2012 - 13:04

They did also release a new bootloader with OE2.0 support:


http://sources.dream...0.0_dm800se.ipk

http://sources.dream...r10.0_dm800.ipk

http://sources.dream...10.0_dm8000.ipk

Octagon SF8008 / TBS5530  DVB-S2/T2 T-85/1.50Mtr/3x90cm (53e 52e 51,5e 28e 25,9e 23e 19e 13e 9e 4e 1w 5w 14w)


Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #50 daimon

  • Senior Member
  • 220 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 8 May 2012 - 20:24

I have compiled a cvs dm800se for the environment is enormous curiosity takes up almost 40GB of space and nfi file is 53.7 mb. ;)

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #51 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:36

Hello,

I just try to compile openpli for dm8000 with kernel 3.2 I just changed the git branch to GIT_BRANCH = dreambox-kernel-3.2 (in make file)
bitbake branch kept on 1.12
Build fails on eglibc log in included. also conf files included and output terminal second try

It seems that kernel headers needed for 3.2 are missing ?

Attached Files



Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #52 popeye2

  • Member
  • 43 posts

+1
Neutral

Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:29

CI+ requires the software to be closed.


Really?
Is CI+ based on obscurity?
IMHO you have a TPM like boot loader not allowing modification of any executable bit ...
But necessarily it is not a hurdle for open source.
Even NDS receivers are linux based nowadays, and GPL license information can be read from user menu (e.g. sky italia)

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #53 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:31

I think I need to change a extra config since it seems it build still kernel 2.6.18 initially instead of 3.2. I can't find anymore in which file tghis config is set

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #54 MiLo

  • PLi® Core member
  • 14,042 posts

+298
Excellent

Posted 10 May 2012 - 18:01

I just try to compile openpli for dm8000 with kernel 3.2 I just changed the git branch to GIT_BRANCH = dreambox-kernel-3.2 (in make file)
bitbake branch kept on 1.12


That branch is mostly for my own convenience, and it (currently) won't finish a compile successfully anyway.
There's probably still a mistake in the .conf somewhere.

Anyway, when it's ready it'll go into the mainline. Until then, it's just there for whomever wants to live on the cutting edge (and thus must expect to bleed).
Real musicians never die - they just decompose

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #55 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 10 May 2012 - 18:46

Yes it was just for test, I noticed that (using the way i did trough adapted make file to build a full image from scratch) It builds the dm8000-2.6.18 and to that it ad's the 2.6.31 libc-headers :)

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #56 ad57

  • Member
  • 2 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 20 May 2012 - 08:06

hi team openpli support 0.e2. for dream800?

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #57 Roodkapke

  • Senior Member
  • 5,782 posts

+29
Good

Posted 20 May 2012 - 13:00

If you mean the latest closed source by DMM, no we will not support it.
We develop our own now, independent from DMM.

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #58 Coolman

  • Member
  • 25 posts

+13
Neutral

Posted 20 May 2012 - 22:02

for plugin developer:

is it possible to make a mips32el pyo at a OE1.6 system ???

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #59 radxnl

  • Senior Member
  • 1,527 posts

+57
Good

Posted 20 May 2012 - 22:23

most oe-core are running on python 2.7 instead of 2.6 so i give you only little chance, but you can try, probably for .py files no problem but .pyo hmmm dunno ;)

more easy is to set up a core distro, its not much work you can use dmm 2.0 or our upcoming oe-core release

Re: OE 2.0 - DreamBox #60 ims

  • PLi® Core member
  • 13,608 posts

+211
Excellent

Posted 21 May 2012 - 08:21

I hope, that PLi will not go on route as DMM and size of image will not finished for 800se over 50MB!!!
Kdo nic nedělá, nic nezkazí!


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users